Hundreds of American college professors have signed an open letter criticizing the campaign to get rid of advanced mathematics in schools, as activists attempt to create more equality by reducing student “achievement gaps.”
Warning that the US would be put at a disadvantage internationally, 911 professors in math, science, and engineering – including professors from Ivy League universities such as Harvard and Yale – expressed their opposition to proposed policies that would make all students take the same level of mathematics regardless of their skills.
“We are deeply concerned about the unintended consequences of recent well-intentioned approaches to reform mathematics education, particularly the California Mathematics Framework,” the open letter said, claiming that “such frameworks aim to reduce achievement gaps by limiting the availability of advanced mathematical courses to middle schoolers and beginning high schoolers.”
Since the beginning of the year, the proposed changes in California have caused a wave of debate in the US, with campaigners calling for similar reforms in other states.
The professors pointed out that “while such reforms superficially seem ‘successful’ at reducing disparities at the high school level, they are merely ‘kicking the can’ to college,” where students will have to spend more time catching up on introductory mathematics, delaying their graduation.
They also warned that the reforms would disadvantage public school children “compared with their international and private-school peers.” In addition, they could result in a “de facto privatization of advanced mathematics K-12 education,” which shuts children from less wealthy families out.
"Subjecting the children of our largest state to such an experiment is the height of irresponsibility… While the US K-12 system has much to improve, the current trends will instead take us further back"
Efforts to reform the California Mathematics Framework (CMF) by eliminating advanced mathematics pathways from middle and high schools have proved highly controversial.
Campaigners in favor of the reforms have argued that it is necessary to address the underrepresentation of black and Latino students in advanced math programs. In contrast, campaigners in opposition have claimed that they hold students back and set a lower standard.
